The Two Covenants in Galatians 4
Henry Marte sets out to follow Paul's argument through Galatians — because Paul is making a case, and to understand it you have to track the case. Here's the sermon, section by section.
"For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman… which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants." Galatians 4:22–24 (KJV)
The problem at Galatia
The church started well, then "certain things were introduced" that knocked it off balance. Jewish believers had accepted parts of the cross but kept clinging to traditions — and taught law-keeping in order to be saved. Paul calls this "another gospel," and his charges are severe:
Paul's letter in three parts
Marte divides Galatians into three movements — and notes Paul always writes doctrine first, then application:
Why so personal? Because the Judaizers attacked the man to destroy the message — "you can see this all throughout politics; whenever you want to destroy somebody's message, you destroy the person." So Paul first re-establishes his credibility, then gets to the gospel.
"Before whose eyes Jesus Christ was set forth"
Paul appeals to the Galatians' own experience (Galatians 3:1). When they first heard the gospel, the cross was so vivid it was "as if they were standing right there at the foot of the cross."
The two women (Galatians 4:22–31)
Now the allegory. Abraham had two sons. Marte lays it out plainly:
- Son: Ishmael, born "after the flesh"
- Mount Sinai, "which gendereth to bondage"
- The earthly Jerusalem, "in bondage with her children"
- A city built by human hands — self-effort
- Son: Isaac, born "by promise"
- "Jerusalem which is above is free"
- "the mother of us all" — for every believer
- A city "built by God, with no man's contribution"
The promised child, Isaac, came by God's promise. But Abraham and Sarah "took too long" waiting, so they "went on trying to help God" — and produced Ishmael through Hagar. Marte: "God makes a promise, and then they in turn tried to finish the promise." That is the Old Covenant instinct — trying to fulfill God's promise by human effort.
The key that unlocks it all: condition, not time
Marte quotes E.J. Waggoner (the 1888-era expositor) — and calls this his favorite part:
"We see then that the two covenants are not a matter of time, but of condition." E.J. Waggoner, on Galatians
Proof it's not about time: Abraham already lived under the New Covenant. "Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws" (Genesis 26:5) — long before Sinai. How? "Because the law was written in his heart… a new heart that God gives you." Abraham "saw Christ" (John 8:56) — he was born again.
The two promises
Ropes of sand
So how good are human promises without the new birth? Marte lands on the image used by a well-known Christian author:
"Without the new heart and the Spirit of God, our promises and resolutions are like ropes of sand." cf. Christ's Object Lessons, p. 159
And the law's two roles: "The law written on stone is a condemning force that shows us our sin and guilt — that's the law that brings us to Christ. But that same law written in the heart is made powerful and effective in my life. One is unchanging; one is transforming. The law doesn't change people, but when that law comes into my heart with Christ, it changes you inside out."
The closing appeal
Paul ends the allegory: "Cast out the bondwoman and her son… we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free" (Galatians 4:30–31). Marte applies it personally: "Cast it out — if you have sin in your heart, cast it out; it doesn't belong there, that's not true of you anymore." And he leaves the congregation with 2 Corinthians 13:5: "Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith" — or, as he puts it, "examine yourself whether you're under the New Covenant relationship with God, and whether you have a new heart."